Alumis' LUMUS trial misses main goals in lupus, but subgroup shows benefit
The Phase 2b study of envudeucitinib failed on its primary and secondary endpoints overall, though patients with high interferon signature responded well, and Alumis plans to pursue Phase 3.
Alumis Inc. said on September 1, 2026 that its Phase 2b LUMUS trial of envudeucitinib for moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus did not meet its primary and secondary endpoints in the overall trial population.1 Despite the miss, the company said key insights from the trial support a clear path forward for regulatory engagement on Phase 3 development.1
The trial did show robust clinical responses in a prespecified subgroup of patients with high interferon gene signature (IFNGS-high), including on the primary endpoint BICLA and on secondary measures such as CLASI-50, SRI-4, and LLDAS.1 Alumis noted that IFNGS-high patients typically respond more favorably to interferon-targeted therapies and were unexpectedly under-represented in LUMUS, which reduced response rates across the full study population.1
On the trial's design, Alumis explained that the global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT05966480) tested three doses of envudeucitinib against placebo over 48 weeks in Part A, with 408 total patients, and used BICLA at Week 48 as the primary endpoint.1
On safety, the company reported that pharmacodynamic data showed dose-dependent interferon-pathway engagement, with the strongest suppression at the 40mg twice-daily dose, and that envudeucitinib was well tolerated with no new safety signals.1
Chief Medical Officer Jörn Drappa said the company plans to engage regulators on Phase 3 development given the subgroup results, according to the release. Separately, Alumis said it remains on schedule to file a New Drug Application for envudeucitinib in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis before the end of 2026, a plan CEO Martin Babler reiterated alongside comments on evaluating the broader TYK2 portfolio.
Written by readthrough’s AI from the linked primary sources and fact-checked against them automatically before publishing. Not investment advice.