readthroughSign in
Aug 12, 2026Quarterly update

Longeveron reports Q2 2026 results, keeps September readout for HLHS heart trial

Longeveron said its Phase 2b HLHS trial for laromestrocel remains on track for September top-line data, with cash on hand extending only into the fourth quarter of 2026.

Longeveron said it is expecting topline results in September 2026 from the Phase 2b clinical trial known as ELPIS II, which is evaluating laromestrocel as a potential adjunct therapy for hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS)1. The trial is run together with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute using funding from the National Institutes of Health1.

Ahead of that readout, the company disclosed two earlier regulatory and oversight steps. In May, it said the FDA held a Type C meeting in late March 2026 on the ELPIS II trial and the upcoming data readout1. Also in May, the independent Data Monitoring Committee finished its last scheduled review; the committee conducted a risk-benefit assessment, found no safety concerns, and cleared the study to proceed as designed to completion1.

For the company's other pipeline programs: the IND for laromestrocel in pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy became effective in July 2025, allowing the company to move directly into a single Phase 2 registrational trial1, which the company expects to start in 2027, with planning beginning this year1. In Alzheimer's disease, a July poster at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference presented additional Phase 2a data showing laromestrocel reduced neuroinflammation in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease1.

On finances, Longeveron reported a net loss of $6.1 million for the quarter, up from $5.0 million a year earlier1. It held $10.1 million in cash as of June 30, 2026, which it said should fund operations into the fourth quarter of 20261 based on its current budget. The company said it intends to pursue additional financing, capital raises, and non-dilutive funding to support its operating plans1.

Written by readthrough’s AI from the linked primary sources and fact-checked against them automatically before publishing. Not investment advice.